Page 1 of 1
Newbie question- why 8v twin cam
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 18:11
by *LOACH*
Hi, I have recently bought a '83 Gemini panelvan and am looking at what engine I want to put in. Due to apparent ease of fitting, G200W is one of the front runners, but I am intrigued as to why Isuzu designed an 8v twin cam, it wouldn't have any greater degree of valve control than a SOHC would it. Sorry if this is a stupid newbie question.
Posted: 16 Dec 2007, 14:57
by *LOACH*
In reply to my own question I did some searching on other forums and according to ImpulseRocket89 at
http://www.isuzone.org/forums/showthread.php?t=1985
The advantages of an 8V Twin cam over SOHC are:
"Top spark plug placement and independant control of each intake and exhaust cycle."
Glad I could be of help....to myself....hopefully someone else will be interested too
Posted: 16 Dec 2007, 15:44
by elky
multi valve engines were not common bach when these were made....but still the dohc can breathe better than the sohc and has better valve control as well
cheers
Posted: 17 Dec 2007, 01:46
by archangel62
And makes the same power as the 16v Nissan CA18DE
Posted: 19 Dec 2007, 09:23
by denny117
The original G161W engine was designed in 1965-66. The engine was intended for Formula 3000 racing in Japan. Once the preliminary design was accomplished, the Isuzu engineers set about fitting it to the R1. The engine was de-tuned and further developed over time for road use and became available in the 117 Coupe, Bellett, Gemini and Piazza as a premium product for it's time.
The reason they developed 8 valve DOHC engines at the time was because of the technology they could mass produce at the time. In modern race engines, a 16valve engine will usually make 20 bhp over it's 8valve counterpart at peak power. Unfortunately this isn't the case with hemispherical combustion chambers. It wasn't until Honda had successfully pioneered the pent roof combustion chamber in the late 60's that making 16valve heads for cars utilising low octane fuel (90-100 octane) became viable. The early days of 16 Valve engines produced some very high revving and peaky engines - the kind of engine that was more at home on a race track than on city streets or highways. Isuzu and most other automobile manufacturers of the time stuck to 8 valve until they could produce a 16 valve engine tractable enough and fuel efficient enought to mass produce, hence the 4XE1 and 4XF1 of the late 80's.
Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 07:59
by IZU069
An advantage with 8V over 16V is torque (all else being the same).
That's definitely evident in the G200W (ie, 360Nm @2,000RPM with standard engine fitted with twin DCOE45s and a 26-inch 2:1 from the standard exhaust manifold.
Posted: 24 Dec 2007, 03:59
by archangel62
no shit..
I kinda like 8V, just for the look when you've got it apart. Two giant valves per cylinder, it just looks gutsy lol
Posted: 25 Dec 2007, 21:10
by elky
and i got both kinds....
g180/200w and the 4xe1.....the 4x loves to rev but does not have the low rpm pull of the w's
Posted: 25 Dec 2007, 21:25
by GeminiCoupe
Might have something to do with the 4X being a short stroke 1.6L elk